Monthly Archives: December 2002

Yes, another interview…

…Just did this quickie with an IAM member who's a journalism student at San Francisco State University. One of the good things for me doing interviews is it really really helps me think about what I'm doing — it's why I try and do interviews, even if it's just for a grade 10 english paper. Dunno if it's interesting, but here it is:

What is your background? How did you get into the world of online publications?

My more ancient history is mentioned in your final question, so I'll answer this in terms of recent history.

When I left highschool I was publishing several zines and had been running a series of computer BBSes where I not only acted as sysadmin but also wrote tutorials on various subversive subjects. On graduation I rejected my success in technical classes and attended York University on a Fine Arts scholarship. I spent most of that year engaged in escalating criminal behavior and at the end of that story found myself fleeing across the country to evade prosecution.

During this process we started a voice telephony business (and cleaned up our acts). We focused on our flagship idea, the "VoiceBBS", which took everything we'd learned from running BBSes and moved it to a voice model. The Internet was taking off, and the IVR market saw it as the future, so a combination of that and discovering USENET's rec.arts.bodyart is how I got online, and the rest is history I guess...

How did you get the idea for www.bmezine.com?

Simple: it's who I am. That's where it first came from. But "it's who YOU are" is what built it. BME is a giant act of personal expression, created by tens of thousands of people who's convergence creates BME.

What are some innovative features you have brought to bmezine.com?

I don't think BME is particularly innovative. Yes, I think it does things better than most (for example, I think the IAM software is one of the best community engines out there), and as time has shown, people seem to agree, but there's nothing truly innovative about it. BME has been successful because it defined a clear philosophy (rather than a business plan) and stuck to it.

What is your philosophy to running www.bmezine.com?

I tried to sum it up at https://www.bmezine.com/why.html

Do you ever refuse to run content and why?

I refuse to run content that I find severely ethically or morally objectionable such as photos of white power tattoos or articles that promote homophobia. Other than that, as long as the content meets the subject mandate, I try and publish it.

Not that everyone agrees on where the subject line should be drawn — one of the more controversial decisions I've made is blocking piercing gun articles from being published on the site, since I feel that the "piercing gun scene" is neither representative the body modification community, nor is it a positive influence on that community.

Is www.bmezine.com profitable? And if so how?

For its first four years, BME received private sponsorship which entirely covered its operating costs. However, when those companies pulled out after advertising negotiations failed, and it became clear that I couldn't reasonably afford to cover the costs personally, I added to BME's charter the requirement to be a traditionally profitable business.

BME makes money by selling memberships to the erotic and more extreme sections of the site. This also serves the purposes of keeping bandwidth down, generating submissions (since they can be "traded" for access), and of keeping gawkers and children out of sections that are inappropriate for them.

That said, when I added "profitability" to BME's statement of purpose, I also added a community mandate — that is, BME must re-invest those profits in the body modification community, rather than into a company's coffers.

Has has BME branched off into other sources of revenue (store, clothing etc.)?

Yes and no. Yes, we sell clothing, supplies, jewelry, and books, but I wouldn't call them "revenue". I first printed shirts because people (myself included them) wanted to wear them, rather than to make a profit. At present, the modest profits generated by BMEshop, coupled with donations, cover the cost of operating the iam.bmezine.com community site and hosting events (hey, fireworks aren't free!).

BMEbooks, our print publishing division, is currently being run as a break-even project (at best). Its primary goal is to publish body modification books that other publishers shy away from, and to provide the world with documentation of a community that has historically not been recorded.

Do you want to publish a print version of BME?

The advantages to publishing BME online are significant. First and foremost, the upfront costs are low and on the whole, cost scales with interest, so it's a dramatically lower financial burden. In addition, the distribution infrastructure required to publish for a demographic which is large but not geographically dense is prohibitively expensive.

Also, a large part of BME is interative and database driven (things like BME/Risks) and continually updated — this type of reference publishing can't reasonably be done in print.

Finally, the other reason that BME is published online rather than offline is that it seeks to be definitive and exhaustive. The sheer bulk of BME can not be published in print at a reasonable cost. Taking a quick look at the current file-set on BME, if the text only (no pictures) were to be printed as a book, it would be nearly 70,000 pages long. For comparison, the average monthly magazine would take fifty years to publish that much, and that's if you include their advertising spaces as content (BME does not run ads).

Do you have any previous experience in the publishing world?

My father was the editor of "Videotext Journal" in the early 80's, so I grew up not just in the publishing world, but also in the online interactive communications world. As a young child I had the opportunity not only to use advanced communications technologies, but to meet and learn from many of the industry's key players and researchers. In addition, ever since I could write, I've published comics, zines, movies, and other small independent media projects.

Philip Berrigan

Thank you, Philip Berrigan.

First, look at that picture. It's truth is simple: “Thou shalt not kill was not a suggestion“. Children understand it. Why do adults forget that it's fundamentally wrong to kill people? Our legal system is built on the concept, “it is worse to imprison one innocent man than to let ten guilty men go free” (even if we don't meet the mandate) — why do we think it's OK to kill millions of innocent people in order to affect political and corporate change? One word: doublethink.

So US District Judge Bates dismissed Walker v. Cheney (seeking a release of documents which would confirm massive corruption in the Bush administration)… Realize this is the conservative Judge that fought aggressively to nail the Clintons. If America is to be a “nation of law” then the law must be unbiassed… Too bad it's becoming clearer and clearer that the law serves nepotism and money, not the American people.

Anyway, thought I ought to share a quote from one of America's leaders to help show where America's headed:

"All the laws of Washington and all the bayonets of the Army cannot force the Negro into our homes, our schools, our churches."
- Strom Thurmond, in his presidential campaign (1948)

"I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either."

- Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) (2002)

But then, maybe it doesn't matter, because it's looking more and more like there's going to be a full nuclear strike on America. The bombs are already in private hands, if I'm reading the news right. As I mentioned a few days ago, radiation detectors have been installed on many public transport systems — but the kicker is that it was all done in secret. We only found out about it because cancer patients were tripping the system.

Now ask yourself — why wasn't this “defense” boasted about by the media? Every single other lame-ass “security enhancement” and “justified” rights violation has been heavily covered in the news. But this one is silent. And then there's the nuclear bunker (caveat lector) being built under Cheney's house. I really only see one likely answer, and that's a nuclear bomb in America that they think may be detonated in the next year.

Let's hope I'm just being paranoid.

Let's hope Dick Cheney's just being paranoid.

I'm in the dark, so I might just be paranoid. But Dick Cheney is not in the dark; he's very well informed. This is calculated. If you want to be really paranoid, ask yourself this question: as anti-war sentiments are growing, and the American people are waking up to the civil rights violations from their government, who will really profit from a nuclear strike on America? Then ask yourself what government has a history of massive military lies and coverups, and already has 30,000 nukes in America.

First strike goodfirst strike bad? They're both American presidents… Which one do you want to believe? The one that has a Nobel Peace Prize, or the one that's most often compared to a monkey because of his primitive understanding of, well, everything?

I think this guy has the right idea: switch to a hydrogen economy (from our oil economy). Let me briefly and simply explain how it works. All of this can be done with readily available tech — there is no crazy high tech, exotic tech, or even large tech needed (on a relative level):

  1. Using solar, wind, and other renewable power, water is electrolysized (split into hydrogen and oxygen). Most of us have done this in highschool science classes. It's really really easy.
  2. The hydrogen is pressurized and burned in traditional internal combustion engines.
  3. The exhaust is hot air and water — no pollution.

It's renewable, it's cheap, it doesn't pollute, it can be produced locally without international corporations or infrastructure, etc… Want to fix the world's problems? This is one of the solutions we must enact — Remember, all power (and all corruption) on this planet comes from control of natural resources. That's it. That's where it all comes from. And we have the ability to eliminate that power structure using hydrogen fuels.

As more and more prominent folks are pointing out, the mainstream media is doing everything it can to downplay anti-war movements… Because they know that the average person wants to “be like everyone else”. I won't just repeat the set here, but AntiWar.com has an excellent set of links that grows every day documenting all the protests — and the broader and broader crowds they're drawing demographically. The media is the one wildcard in this war — if the media flips, and takes a pacifist stance, the war ends. It's that simple.

Well, time to go read the Windows API documentation for the SetPriorityClass function… I'm 99% sure that's all I need to call to keep the submissions tool from being so rude (that's why the server slows down sometimes).

Back

A number of people had reported that there were problems with the IAM server, so for that and a couple other reasons I headed back to investigate. As far as I can tell, the slowdown is due to a bug in my image submissions tool. My base-64 routines are admittedly sloppy and very CPU and memory intensive — they have to be rewritten in assembler when I get a chance.

Anyway, when those routines run, if there have been a lot of submissions inside that 15-minute window, or if there were troubles reaching my email server during that window, sometimes there can be multiple processes running, and they can be very rude, hogging the whole CPU. Tommorrow I'll do some work on those to at least make them more polite.

I got the BME temporary tattoos (is that a bad thing? some people think so…) today — FINALLY, after many shipping-related fiascos. They're not for sale but I will give Ryan a pile of them to throw in with orders. In addition, if you are hosting a BBQ, etc., drop me a line with your address and I'd be glad to send an envelope full your way.

Weird ride…

My train ride to Toronto was spent with a low functioning albeit rather wealthy older gay man telling me the recent sob stories of his life. He was, as I mentioned, incredibly stupid, and also very trusting. He was a former Catholic guidance counselor who'd been fired in June for discussing his sex life with his students.

Anyway, as I was sitting next to him he kept getting calls from a guy who was alternately threatening to kill himself and then his (the guy I was sitting next to's) boyfriend as well. Apparently it was a homeless guy that he'd picked up last time he was in Toronto and spent a few nights with at his hotel, who'd then stolen his credit cards and hustled him for about $10,000.


Other than that, the cover story on the Globe&Mail this morning (the hotel handed it to me, and I didn't have a computer there so it was the extent of my news contact) was that in the next four months Canada will be fully decriminalizing recreational marijuana use, and will be encouraging those who want it to grow it themselves. The article stated that Britain would be doing the same in that time period…

As I mentioned, I really think America may do the same — first, because it'll greatly decrease crime and increase quality of life in volatile communities (ie. less chance of revolt — give a little, take a lot)… But more importantly: SOMA.


WOW. Damn IAM is fast when you're on a low-latency connection (I'm on a Ryan's OC-3 right now).

And as you know I have very little memory. At this point I only remember fragments of living in Toronto, so it's funny coming back — makes me feel like a real hick: “Gee these towers are tall! I'll bet they hold an awful lot of silage!”

Pyromania

It's no secret that I like to blow things up. The bigger the explosion the better. I didn't enjoy watching the UPS truck come within 6″ of destroying the Porsche, but I sure did enjoy what it delivered. Want to help set them off? You'll have to come to the New Year's BBQ.