First of all, sorry about all the password emails last night, I have no idea what happened and I'm getting to the bottom of it now. Some kind of delayed Y2K thing probably (what I'm saying is it was totally unexpected). Anyway, it's being dealt with now.
A supreme court judge in Mississipi just said that gays and lesbians should be institutionalised. The exact and shocking quote, from a letter to the editor he wrote earlier this year regarding gay and lesbian partners being able to sue in wrongful death cases, not just an off-the-cuff comment, is:
In my opinion, gays and lesbians should be put in some type of mental institute instead of having a [domestic partnership] law like this passed for them. I got sick on my stomach as I read the news story... The last verse of chapter one of the book of Romans in our HOLY BIBLE is my reason for responding.
Now, I think it's important to now go and read that verse — it's where it gets scary.
Who knowing the judgement of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
That is, this Supreme Court Judge is actually advocating the death sentence for gays and lesbians. People regularly say to me, “Oh, Shannon, you shouldn't complain so much about these legal things — there's a system of checks whereby if a lower court violates civil rights, appeals to higher courts can fix the mistake.”
His statement was made in March. While a state commission on Friday recommended that he be given a $150 fine. And that's just a recommendation. So here's the deal: if a Supreme Court Judge advocates the death penalty for gays and homosexuals, they might get a fine that's less than an hour's pay. Yeah, I'm sure that'll stop them. Good going, checks and balances.
A judge that publicly states that they are unable to think rationally regarding ten to twenty percent of the population should be immediately removed from office. Come on! What if he'd said, “blacks are not human, and as such be put to death if they commit a crime?”
Why is this tolerable?
When plunder has become a way of life for a group of people living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it, and a moral code that glorifies it.
- Frederic Bastiat
But then again, it seems to be hard to find a Republican, at least a Republican politician that's not a racist. Dunno why. For all I know it's the same for the Democrats as well; thanks to Lott though, the Republicans are getting all their bigoted skeletons dragged out of the closet. (There are more stories on this subject on sites like cursor.org)
I'm not entirely sure where I stand on this story. Basically, the US government just intervened to stop inexpensive drugs from getting to third world nations. As a result, millions of people will probably die horribly because they can't afford treatments. However, the core issue is international patent protection; the US is left with two choices on this:
- Relax patent laws, allow drugs to be copied in certain developing nations. Save a lot of lives, but make no significant extra profit.
- Don't relax patent laws, don't allow drugs to be copied in these nations. No lives saved, no profit made either.
However, the second example isn't entirely true, as it ignores international aid. The US government sends massive amounts of aid to foreign countries, and the above gives you a peek into why. Let's assume that the US continues to stick with the second policy (which it is). That means that any aid group fighting HIV, malaria, TB, etc. in Africa has to buy the drugs at full commercial markup, using taxpayer money and donations.
It's just another policy that works best for big business, and worst for the people of this planet. At the same time though, I'm not sure if we should be able to force companies to hand over their research just because it's in the general good… The question is, how much freedom is lost by not protecting the freedom to make evil choices? (I certainly don't have an answer for that.)
The average family pays more in taxes than it spends on food, clothing, and shelter combined.
- Dick Armey
I'll mention now that one of the many reasons most of my news regards the US government is because the US is “cutting edge” when it comes to defining the new corporate run world and rides at least ten to twenty years ahead on the corruption wave. What's happening in the US right now will happen in Canada and then the rest of the West as well. It is an inevitable conclusion of a system that allows the existence of large corporate bodies.
To get another angle on how a government manages to enact such misguided policies, take a look at how Bush chooses his scientific advisors. Basically, the primary screening is political and ideological, rather than scientific. That is, poor science is chosen over good science if it serves the political goals of the administration. Which in the long run equates to no science at all — which equates to a short sighted and dangerous foundation.
To speak of atrocious crimes in mild language is treason to virtue.
- Edmund Burke
There's an interesting new study over at the Pew Research Center. I downloaded the complete report; here are “some” of the numbers that struck me (sorry, it's longer than it should be, just scroll over it if you get bored):
- Over 75% of Americans think they are better off today or the same as they were five years ago (which is clearly insane given that the economy has plummeted in the last five years and civil rights have been slashed). Americans also almost universally stated that in five years again things would be even better. However, 55% said they were dissatisfied with the way the country is going (hello doublethink).
- That said, only a very small amount of other countries state marked improvement in the last five years: Nigeria and Ghana. Many African nations reported that in the future they believed they'd be great nations. South America and Asia reported the same, whereas Europe pretty universally identified itself as a dying continent.
- 74% of North Americans said they were satisfied or very satisfied with their household income.
- No country said that they were happier with their income than their family life, so that's good I think. The only countries to rank their family satisfaction below 50% were Ghana and Uganda.
- Only two countries stated that they felt they were satisfied with their country's actions today: Uzbekistan and Canada. Every other country interviewed citizen's reported overall dissatisfaction, with notable lows being Argentina (3%), Bulgaria (4%), Turkey (4%), and India (9%).
- When asked about general satisfaction with the world, most countries report about an 80% dissatisfaction level. Several countries ranked lower because of the bulk of “I don't know” answers such as China, and only Pakistan reported a significantly higher rate, with almost double the world satisfaction of other nations.
- When asked what the greatest threat to the world is, US citizens mostly said nuclear weapons. While many countries agreed, other leaders included bigotry (Canada, UK and most of Europe, and many others), AIDS and disease (Egypt and much of Africa and South America), and pollution (a couple Asian countries). Only Eastern Europe and Argentina named the rich/poor gap as a leading threat.
- 50% of Americans and 23% of Britain citizens consider terrorism a very big problem. Of all Western countries, Canadians, who listed their biggest problem (of the options presented) as political corruption and disease, are least concerned with terrorism.
- Of all countires excluding African nations, America is dramatically the most happy with its military.
- The only country in the world to be very happy with its immigrants is Canada.
- Americans are happier with Bush (himself) than they are with both the government as a whole or their religious leaders.
- Africans still get most of their news from radio, whereas TV is dominant in the rest of the world.
- TV leads newspapers by a dramatic margin in most of the world for general news, but when it comes to international news, newspapers dominate. Only Bangladesh gets most of its international news from TV.
- 78% of Canadians have a favorable opinion of Americans, with Europe falling between 63% and 83% (about the same). Notable lows include Egypt (13%) and Pakistan (17%).
- Americans believe that America almost always take into account the interests of other countries when acting internationally. Very few countries agree, but there are a few that do, surprisingly including Vietnam.
- Every country surveyed agreed that having a second superpower equivalent to America would make the world more dangerous. This question was not asked in China for obvious reasons.
- While nearly four in five Americans said other countries would be better off if they adopted American ideals, the only countries to agree with that statement were the Ivory Coast, Nigeria, and the Philippines.
- That said, almost every country on the planet said they like US movies, TV, and music, with Canada liking it more than any other Western country (including the US!). Notable haters of US media culture include Bolivia, Russia, Bangladesh, Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan (bottom of the list, with only 4% saying they like it).
- Every country except Pakistan and Russia said it admired the US for its technological innovation.
- Of Western countries, Canada most objected to the war on terror. Agentina, Senegal, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Turkey all significantly opposed it.
- Americans are the least travelled citizens of any Western nation, and know the least people in other nations.
- Europeans report the least personal financial difficulties, followed closely by North America. The rest of the world is not doing so well, to put it lightly. America has the poorest citizens of all Western nations, although this number is skewed by medical costs being much higher in America.
Damn, I just wasted way too much time reading that. Oh, and those are based on about a thousand interviews in each nation. For a more anecdotal version of the above, here's a story about Pakistan.
A piece of freedom is no longer enough for human beings... unlike bread, a slice of liberty does not finish hunger. Freedom is like life. It cannot be had in installments. Freedom is indivisible - we have it all, or we are not free.
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
The UN is already making plans to clean up the mess the US is about to make in Iraq: 900,000 refugees, plus a potential ecological disaster. A pack of lies and strange omissions designed not to fight terror, but to fuel the defense industry and guarantee this planet is covered with weapons that have the potential to destroy it.
Which means that when (if) Korea goes through with reunification we're back to a cold war mutually assured destruction standoff. Are you really looking forward to drug addicted pilots dropping fire on a nuclear nation lead by a genuine madman?
Anyway, to finish with a precis of Charley Reese's colum today, Anti-War Not The Same As Anti-Defense, (click his name to read the whole thing):
People should make a distinction between someone being anti-war and being anti-defense. The best way, as George Washington said, to preserve the peace is to be prepared for war. The worst thing politicians can do is to squander the nation's resources in unnecessary wars.
Look at Vietnam. We know in retrospect that it doesn't make one iota's difference to us that Vietnam is communist. American politicians and businessmen have flocked to do business with the communists. Yet politicians wasted 57,000 American lives presumably to prevent Vietnam from going communist. Another 40,000 were wasted in Korea, as if the politics of the Korea peninsula mattered to us one way or another. I hasten to add, of course, that in both instances it matters a great deal to the Vietnamese and the Korean people.
PS. This just came in via ServMe: Coffee, Tea, or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell at the Airport and Then Lying About Why We Put You There?. Yes, it's what it sounds like. Now to “fight terror”, airline officials are forcing pregnant women to take their clothes off in public to prove that they're really pregnant, not just wearing a body suit.
Yay for freedom!
A society that will trade a little order for a little freedom will lose both, and deserve neither.
- Thomas Jefferson
Anyway, I'm off to do more year-end work for BME right now (thanks to help from PluR and Vanilla) so it's not just more of the same-old. Sorry this entry was so long, I just got wrapped up in that survey!
The times call for courage. The times call for hard work. But if the demands are high, it is because the stakes are even higher. They are nothing less than the future of human liberty, which means the future of civilization.
- Henry Hazlitt
Oh, and the new lense should get here today (thanks Phil) so I'll post some shots from it when it does…
