The Life of an Ape

In the past week and a half I’ve been arrested and charged for a crime I didn’t commit, accused of at least three other major crimes I didn’t commit, and really am starting to feel like I’m living in some terrible mystery-thriller movie with all of these orchestrated events going on around me. It’s quite a surreal experience.

orangutan-baby.jpg

Speaking of surreal experiences, I was at the zoo with my daughter on Friday, and I always wonder what the orangutans are thinking as they cluster around the edge of their cells and stare woefully at the crowds tapping on the glass and taking their pictures. With many of the great apes scoring as high as humans on IQ tests, to say nothing of even very simple animals like crows (who use and invent tools), you have to wonder what their world view would be… It’s as if they’re living in The Truman Show but can see the audience the whole time. Do they realize they’re slaves and prisoners? Or because it’s the only thing they’ve ever experienced, they don’t really think about it? With minds that are roughly equivalent to humans, they must at least wonder about it.

Because there has been some evidence of apes that are taught great ape sign language are able to then teach their children or each other, I’ve always had this fantasy that apes could learn human languages and re-enter the wild, eventually emerging in huge numbers, demanding the right to vote or something. But outside of the fact that this is likely biologically impossible, as Douglas Adams wrote in The Great Ape Project,

There are many members of our own species who live in and with the forest and know it and understand it. We don’t listen to them. What is there to suggest we would listen to anything an ape could tell us? Or that he would be able to tell us of his life in a language that hasn’t been born of that life?… Maybe it is not that they have yet to gain a language, it is that we have lost one.

I mean, we don’t even tend to listen to other humans that demand rights, and it generally takes decades of legal battles (to say nothing of physical resistance) to get even minor improvements… why would we listen to animals? It’s not as if we’ve granted them any rights, let alone human-level rights (or whatever term you want to give to the rights afforded to we sentient beings that share this planet) — to quote Jeremy Bentham from Introduction to Principles of Morals and Legislation,

The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor… What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or, perhaps, the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day, or a week, or even a month, old. But suppose the case were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not, “Can they reason?” nor, “Can they talk?” but, “Can they suffer?”

21 Comments

  1. Jifeqwik wrote:

    i’m currently taking a linguistics class right now, and though it’s quite boring one of the few interesting subjects we’ve discussed is ape sign language. from what i remember, most apes can never progress beyond a small child’s vocabulary, and also can only learn to “speak” in the present tense.

    it has to due with the fact that their mouths aren’t suited for speaking the same way people do, and because they lack the physical tools for language the parts of the brain that control it are far less developed.

    that’s not to say that they aren’t intelligent, though, as it has been proven that they are.

    Monday, October 8, 2007 at 6:19 pm | Permalink
  2. estrojenn wrote:

    jane goodall is one of my heroes.

    and i hate the zoo because i really feel like the animals would kill me if they could get out of their cages.

    Monday, October 8, 2007 at 7:15 pm | Permalink
  3. Scienkoptic wrote:

    I’m in the middle of reading:
    “More Readings From One Man’s Wilderness”
    The Journals of Richard L. Proenneke
    1974-1980

    On several occasions he states the Following: ” Is it proper that the wilderness and it’s creatures should suffer because we came?”
    Shannon’s current entry made me think of the quote.

    Nature gives us so much and in return we give nothing much back but misery, pollution and extinction. My parents raised me to take nothing that can’t be replaced (i.e.: firewood)and leave nothing that doesn’t belong.
    A life outdoors was my childhood and seeing nature at work was far more fascinating than watching animals languishing in zoos. That said, most of the great primates will end up existing exclusively in zoos. The Folks that live amongst them like to eat them.

    Monday, October 8, 2007 at 8:15 pm | Permalink
  4. rusty wrote:

    I remember the last zoo i visited, the apes, chimps, orangutans, etc acted like they could do me in if they had half a chance. Not unlike the surly peacock that chased me.

    I am sure if I was put into a corner I would become the most vengful (sic) person. And by the way, before someone says it to me, I really don’t care for lemonade anymore.

    Monday, October 8, 2007 at 8:58 pm | Permalink
  5. CrimsonCherub wrote:

    i haven’t been to a zoo in ages.

    last i visited, the poppa orangutan was surrounded by a class of about 15 or 20 children all pounding on the glass…much like what you saw, his forehead was actually pressed on the glass, and his eyes were empty. he took a deeeeeeeeep breath and let out a heavy sigh.

    i walked away in tears and haven’t gone back.

    at any rate, i hope you’re able to unplug yourself from the matrix ;)

    Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 2:13 am | Permalink
  6. janey wrote:

    I think that they deserve far more rights than they have… but I don’t believe it will happen. Humans are far more caught up in other issues for it to ever progress. Maybe one day? It’s the kind of thing people have to come to make their mind up about on their own, from their own personal experiences with animals.

    I realise zoos play a part in conservation and research, but where does that stop and capitalism begin? I’d much rather use the $ I pay for entry, to donate to a giant park where the animals can range free, and I’ll just look at photographs, rather than demand small enclosures where I can bash on the windows.

    That said… I’d miss having baboons throw shit at me.

    Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:24 am | Permalink
  7. nausea wrote:

    i often dream of civil rights for bonobos (and hope for synthetics one day :) ).
    the “pan” genus is ridiculous: they are homo.

    Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:58 am | Permalink
  8. Wldfire_1 wrote:

    The few times i have been to a zoo with apes, i have been fasinated by seeing them,but saddended as they usally look pretty sad/bored/empty. Its like it takes away part of their soul being trapped in a cage put on show. They are far too smart to do something like that to. Or at least thats my 2 cents worth. :)

    Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink
  9. Caitlin wrote:

    Read my book about orangutans by (Canadian) Birute Galdikas-the third woman of the ape studying trio, along with Jane Goodall and Dian Fossey. Brilliance. And, while you’re borrowing MY books (for once), take the one about rhinos, and both the beaver books.

    You should meet me for lunch today.

    Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 11:41 pm | Permalink
  10. Anthony wrote:

    I stare at my teenage snapping turtle Ajax, he just stares right at my eyes when I hold him or look at him while he’s in the tank. Though he does have the most basic instinct of trying to snap at your finger if you just wiggle it in a certain motion near him(he doesn’t fight at all when handled). I’m just amazed at how smart he’s gotten and also watching him adapt to swimming has been interesting. Love him. . And on the thing you said about crows I saw a video on stumble of a crow trying to get an object out of tube with a wire and after failing several times he bent it into a hook and then got it.

    Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 1:57 am | Permalink
  11. Dustin wrote:

    Shannon, I’m reading a book right now that might interest you. It’s called “The Spell of the Sensuous” by a man name Abram. It’s peripherally related to what you’re writing about here – how, because we’ve adopted an alphabetic /visual culture (as opposed to an oral one), we’ve lost touch with our senses….. we’ve lost the abilities that we, as humans, have had since time immemorial. It’s hard to explain but it relates to how we’ve disengaged from the land and other animals completely, because we only speak in a purely made-up ‘human’ language. It goes to great lengths to ‘prove’ that traditionally oral cultures believe that humans were given language by animals.

    Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 3:48 am | Permalink
  12. Jennica wrote:

    despite the possibility of a frown when thinking of imprisonment, on many levels, it is a lovely picture :)

    Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 1:59 pm | Permalink
  13. ELY_M wrote:

    Im shocked about your arrest :(
    do you think you will beat those fake charges?

    Do you know sign language?
    I seen one of t-shirt with sign language at bme.
    I was wondering who designed the t-shirt?

    Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 3:25 am | Permalink
  14. Paula wrote:

    There’s a reason why i’m a zoologist (and no i don’t ever intend to work in a zoo) It’s because i’ve realised that animals are much more intelligent than humans and i would prefer to spend my days surrounded by them rather than people

    Friday, October 12, 2007 at 2:55 am | Permalink
  15. MetalMelter wrote:

    Aside from humans, apes are one of if not the only other animal that will give its own life in the defense of another. I have always been fascinated by the intelligence of some of the higher thinking creatures- there’s a whole undiscovered world out there, waiting for us to slow down- listen= and find it.

    Saturday, October 13, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink
  16. gayle wrote:

    The concept of personhood is what ethicists use to differentiate between morally relevant and irrelevant beings, but the idea has been so abstracted and seperated from actual beings that the idea would include sets of non human animals and exclude sets of human beings and becomes self contradictory to the purpose of which it was originally conceived. wouldn’t it be more fair to not base our treatment of all other beings on their membership or non-membership to an arbitrary group called the morally relevant, and instead treat them as being the same thing we all are; conscious beings experiencing their one glimpse of life?

    Sunday, October 14, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink
  17. Brandon Danger wrote:

    This whole thing reminds me of “Ishmael”. An amazing book indeed and highly relevent in this blog as it is about the lessons learned by a highly self educated gorilla. It never learned to speak as it lacked the capacity, so it learned telepathy.
    Also it’s arguments for primitivism (or at least a significantly reduced eco footprint) are pretty rad as well.
    As far as primates capacity for speech… How many have grown up learning a language? The answer is likely none, which means that their capacity for language is pretty much untested. Feral children that learn their first language later in life never achieve as firm a grasp on it as those who learn them young. The brain just doesn’t work the same later in most cases.
    I’d say that most primatologists are probably still speciest, in that they likely still see the animals as “lesser” than people.
    Besides, from the perspective of either an animal or person cloer to a more hunter gatherer way of life, living in the preset is whats important far more so than the future.

    Tuesday, October 16, 2007 at 4:21 am | Permalink
  18. That’s why i’m a vegan

    Friday, November 9, 2007 at 7:57 pm | Permalink
  19. oniana wrote:

    have you read adams’ “last chance to see”? brilliant fun times with kimodo dragons

    Sunday, December 2, 2007 at 12:50 am | Permalink
  20. RachelG wrote:

    Shannon…

    I was honored enough to spend one hour with one of the few families left (in the world!) of mountain gorillas in Uganda. It was one of the most amazing experiences of my life. They share 98% of our DNA and it is completely evident by observing their behaviour.

    Due to their endangered status no reputable zoo in the world would keep them in captivity, however when I see Western Lowland Gorillas and other apes in zoos and the such it brings a deep pain to my soul. Human beings still have soo much to learn as a species… We can be so wise in some aspects, and so ignorant in others.

    Email me if you’re interested in hearing more about them or discussing this!

    Monday, February 18, 2008 at 7:03 pm | Permalink
  21. Sarah wrote:

    hey this is off topic but idk where else to ask you. I saw you posted a animal rights tattoo (the half a human hand and half a paw together) and I was wondering if that was your tattoo and if it wasn’t, then then whose because I want to get one like that, just a little different, but I guess I’d like to make sure it’d be ok with the creator of it.
    please email me: surr_uh@hotmail.com
    the last thing i want is to post it somewhere and someone thinking i stole their idea without asking.
    thanks!

    Monday, April 7, 2008 at 8:49 am | Permalink
Wow Shannon, that's really annoying! What is it, 1997 on Geocities? Retroweb is NOT cool!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*